British Mandate Palestine INTERNATIONAL OBSERVERS

Why does Israel object to "international observers" in the West Bank and Gaza?

A cursory glance at history shows that the reason for Israel's objection is the same as for Arafat's enthusiasm: International observers will not protect the cease-fire, but will provide cover for Palestinian Arabs to violate it. The long record of international observers in the Arab-Israeli conflict is unblemished by a single sustained example of basic fairness toward Israel, let alone protection from Arab aggression.

Here is a brief history of "international observers" and their role in Israel's concerns for its security and defense:

Yasser Arafat favors international observers, especially if they can be deployed without a firm committment to a Palestinian Arab cease-fire, because they will tend to reward his policy of violence. Israel has been repeatedly attacked and its only defense is to maintain some defensive control over the areas where the attacks originate. As history has shown, the observers will limit Israels defense options without limiting the use of terror against Israel. In Arafat's calculus, observers will freeze the lines and allow him to proceed with diplomatic ploys to extend the gains. If diplomacy fails, he can resort to terror again as he has repeatedly. For Israel, it is a salami game where they lose slice by slice until the whole is gone. Israel may eventually accept observers, either because of intense international pressure, or if and when the observers are introduced along with appropriate guarantees and protections.

Sources and additional reading on this topic:


MORE ON
FREQUENTLY ASKED QUESTIONS