Israel’s Law of Return

What was the Jewish Law of Return to Israel?

On July 5, 1950, the Israeli Knesset passed the Law of Return, fulfilling the dream of Theodor Herzl, Zionism’s founder. Herzl experienced anti-Semitism in Europe and saw its effects in many countries. He saw that there was only one solution: the mass immigration of Jews to a land that they could call their own.


The law begins with a few simple words that defined Israel?s central purpose:

  • Every Jew has the right to immigrate to this country ...

The State of Israel was established for the very purpose of repatriating the Jewish people from the Diaspora, to enable the "Ingathering of the Exiles", to give every Jew anywhere in the world the option to return to the land of his fathers. Two thousand years of wandering were officially over.

The Law of Return (and related Law of Citizenship) states that every Jew in the world has the inherent right to settle in Israel as an automatic citizen; it emphasizes the purpose of Israel as a homeland for all Jews. The law does not attempt to define the term Jew, which has caused controversy in Israel from time to time. A 1970 amendment accords the right to immigrate to Israel to non-Jews who are either children or grandchildren of a Jew, the spouse of a Jew or the spouse of a child or grandchild of a Jew. The amendment was intended to accept in Israel families, mainly from Eastern Europe, where mixed marriages were abundant.

There are exceptions under the law, if a Jew has converted to another religion, or if the person posed an imminent danger to public health, state security, or the Jewish people as a whole. Terrorists are not entitled to "return", even if they were Jewish.Others, non-Jewish, who want to settle in Israel, whether Arab or from any other origin, may do so if thry meet the requirements set forth in the Law of Entry to Israel (1952) and the Law of Citizenship (1952), regarding naturalization. These requirements are similar to the immigration laws of most countries.

The main criticism raised against the Law of Return is that is discriminates against Arabs and especially against Palestinian refugees who wish to return to their former homes in Israel. This argument has no basis; obviously there is no sense in inviting any Arab who so desires to immigrate at will into Israel, the Jewish State which was established for the Jewish People in accordance with the UN Resolution 181, and by virtue of the right of the Jewish People to self determination. The bestowal of the "right of return" to Israel to non-Jews or to persons without a Jewish relative is illogical and contradicts the principal purpose of setting up a Jewish State as prescribed by the Balfour Declaration of 1917, the League of Nations Mandate of 1922, and the UN Resolution of November 1947. The Law of Return is central to what the State of Israel stands for. Proposing to open Israel to immigration by any Arab is a disguised way of proposing the extinction of Israel.

Ever since its establishment, Israel has reiterated that it is a Jewish and democratic state. The Law of Return and the Law on Citizenship reflect the tension that exists in Israel between Israel's desire to be a Jewish state, a state of the entire Jewish people, and at the same time its desire to be a democratic state.

Controversy also exists over the Law of Return with respect to its wording among those who are favor retaining the law, because of the "Who is a Jew?" issue relating to the law. There are differing approaches to this subject among Israeli and Diaspora Jews, in terms of defining a Jew for the purpose of the Law of Return. There is also a lively debate over the meaning of the terms "Jewish State" and "State of the Jews."

Discussion around the law and its wording constantly reappears on private and public agendas in Israel and the Diaspora. The Knesset has repeatedly debated proposals to amend the Law of Return, and it has indeed been amended a number of times over the years. These modifications reflect the changes that have taken place in Israeli society and the shifts taking place in political dialogue both inside Israel itself, as well as between Israel and the Diaspora. The present law also constitutes an expression of permanent trends, as well as of the Israeli legislative system's ability to adapt itself to changing circumstances.

Tickets To Kevin Hart   Madonna Concert Tickets  Bb King Reno Tickets


Note: This is a moderated site. Only comments that add value to the discussion will be published.

§ 6 Responses to Israel’s Law of Return

  • alex says:

    Im from Brazil very far from your problems but facts show that Israel is the bad guy. Israel is looking everyday more like a nazist nation and thats crazy.

  • lee says:

    I don’t see any Jews forcing Jews, let alone, Palestinians into death camps. So how do you make that comparison? The last time I heard, there are Arabs who live rather well in Israel. Israel has negotiated with the so-called Palestinian Authority. There was no negotiating with Nazi’s that the Jews could have done to save their lives.

  • Adam says:

    I don’t expect this comment to be published. What constitutes a Jew under the Law of Return that has ALWAYS been constant is that a Jew is one born of a Jewish mother. The disputes are over the religious element, not the ethnicity. And the Human Genome Project Jewish Study shows that we are descendants of the Babylonian Exile period Jews, and across the world, we are more closely related to each other (4th or 5th cousins) than we are to the host populations we live amongst dispersed. The largest degree of interbreeding gives some Jewish populations 25% admixture, but that means 75%of the DNA from 2700 years ago AND we are all descended from a genetic bottleneck (one father, three mothers) from over 3500 years ago…which is consistent with our oral and written histories…and 161,000 genetic markers on the Human Genome.

    The Philistines, however, are long gone. There is no genetic link to the peoples of the Pentapolis (five city states) of Philistia. They were assimilated and destroyed by the Assyrians well before 700BCE…or over 2700 years ago.

    And I agree with Lee, above.

  • Herbert says:

    The Thirteenth Tribe is a book by Arthur Koestler, which advances the thesis that Ashkenazi Jews are not descended from the historical Israelites of antiquity, but from Khazars, a Turkic people.

  • Uriel says:

    Islamic Nations are More Like Nazi Germany than Israel.

    As in Israel, Jews, Christians & Muslims, Preach, Pray, help their fellow neighbor.

    But alot of the problems inside Israel, come from Anti-Zionist groups, like Neturei Karta & Satmar that have spat on people, an showed disdain to women & children.

    Other problems Inside Israel also come from Muslims, which are involved with Terrorist Groups like Hezballah & Hamas, an linking groups.

    So if you have a problem with Israel, doing what it must to protect itself, u also have a problem with your own authorities in your own nations putting pedofiles in Jail, where they belong.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>